The Problem with Winners

World records can’t be un-broken. Breakthroughs can’t be reversed. This would seem to be a good thing, and for the most part, it is. Someone being the “GOAT” is inspiring and motivating to nearly everyone. However, this one-way ratcheting of standards can have some consequences. Much like living in Manhattan, it is out of reach for mere mortals. This is because we as a society have always put a premium on the Winners.

In 1954 Roger Bannister was the first person to officially run a mile in less than four minutes, something previously deemed to be impossible. Now college athletes do this all the time. While this is an unavoidable situation, it brings up two questions. Was Bannister just a mediocre runner? (He is by today’s standards.) Are todays’s college athletes who exceed his achievement any less impressive than he was? It was the state of the art that changed. (I’m ignoring better shoes and training technology that weren’t around in the 1950s.) We have already seen that Olympic medals are dominated by athletes from prosperous countries that can afford to train them full-time at massive cost, not to mention steroids and other cheating.

Classical piano competitions have now advanced to the point where a split-note, small mistake or hesitation is a fatal error. Only flawless performances can advance in the rankings. Once somebody played the piece perfectly, nobody is ever going to get away with any less. The giants of the 19th century could possibly have flunked out of school today, or at least been considered “mediocre” based on this ever-advancing standard.

I was listening to some vintage jazz recordings, and quickly noticed what would today be regarded as sloppy playing. It was still great, even iconic music, but whether we like it or not, the “goalposts” have been moved since then, and I know I would not tolerate those imperfections in my own playing today, even though I don’t see myself as being on the level of these musicians of the past. Imagine the beginner or aspiring young musician confronting these standards as a price of admission.

Celebrating “winning” is very important, but much like how at the current rate, the world will overheat and choke on the carbon dioxide we create and drown in a sea of single-use plastic containers, we eventually risk losing excellence in a sea of perfection and World Records. We also risk making greatness increasingly inaccessible.


Comments

5 responses to “The Problem with Winners”

  1. EDUARDO LOPEZ SANCHEZ Avatar
    EDUARDO LOPEZ SANCHEZ

    How right you are with your comments. Indeed, more and more, humanity demands more of itself, and music is no exception. However, the beauty of jazz lies in the musician who composes for him and for others to enjoy it, in his performance, without thinking about whether or not there are mistakes, in his improvisation, where they indulge in his freedom and his virtuosity. in the execution of the instrument, in the possibility of creating for pleasure and for the love of music. And you are one of those great jazz musicians. Go ahead, Randy, with your music project.

    Eduardo López Sánchez, Mexico.

    1. randyhoexter Avatar
      randyhoexter

      Thank you!

  2. adam nolan Avatar
    adam nolan

    It seems as though the evolutionary process operates and maintains its principle functions in mental capacities, as well as physical. Even if I exceeded my wildest expectations as a student, musician, and overall human being, I would hope within 20 generations or so my accomplishments would be seen as necessary rungs on the evolutionary ladder, but ultimately regarded as remedial in contrast to the standard practice of that day. Ad infinitum. Having said that, identifying one’s nature with the mind mores0 than the body yields some interesting thought experiments: Would I have arrived at the same level of mastery and drawn the same conclusions as Archimedes, or Kepler; would I have given the same priceless gifts to humanity as they? Given the tools and knowledge readily available in each timeframe, I very well may not have. And yet, I and most others are able to understand their teachings and regard them as fundamental, but not necessarily advanced by the standards of today. It is the discovery of such concepts and practices that distinguishes these humans, or rather these Minds from their contemporaries. Furthermore, discovery and innovation seem to be equally as admirable if not more so than the subsequent mastery of a given practice or discipline.

    It seems as though evolution, if functioning optimally, disregarding the subjectivity of such a word, relies heavily upon homeostasis, which is a concept that humanity struggles with. Nonetheless I remain optimistic that humanity’s wholistic nature will soon change, even if such a change is catalyzed by a rude awakening.

    Thank you for sharing such thought provoking material.

    1. randyhoexter Avatar
      randyhoexter

      On the shoulders of giants, we stand. Great comment. Thank you for reading and for your thoughts.

  3. Expecting perfection in a performance artist seems to miss the point of the art. Having grown up in a family of performing artists, I know that the perceptions of the audience are what we seek, and we would be crippled in our ability to perform if we expected to perform perfectly every time we step in front of an audience ( though I know many people are!) At some point, we must decide what is “good enough,” without giving up on becoming the best we can be. If we had to be perfect in every note, who would ever have the nerve to improvise? No one I know. And yes, I have heard even the masters hit a wrong note on occasion – but I always feel that this just shows their humanity, not their weakness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *